Terms and conditions for services
Standard business to business terms for a supplier of services: charges, liability, intellectual property and termination, to send with every quotation.
What's inside
- Two charging options, time and materials or fixed price
- A liability cap drafted to be reasonable under UCTA 1977
- Intellectual property, confidentiality and data protection
- How the terms are incorporated into each order
Word document. Drafted by Lawyerly's commercial solicitors. Last updated September 2026.
Download your free copy
Tell us who you are and the file is yours straight away.
Standard terms only protect you if they form part of the contract
Most small suppliers have terms and conditions. Rather fewer can show that the customer agreed to them, and that is the point at which they matter. Terms that live on a website and are never referred to in the quotation or the order acknowledgement have a habit of not being part of the contract at all, which leaves the supplier relying on implied terms and on whatever the customer's own purchase order said.
The fix is procedural rather than legal. Send the terms with every quotation, refer to them in the acceptance of each order, and keep the record. Where a customer sends its own terms back, the exchange becomes a question of which set got in last, and that is worth noticing at the time rather than during a dispute.
Business to business only
These terms are drafted for a supplier selling services to other businesses. They should not be used with consumers. A consumer contract is governed by the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which implies terms that cannot be excluded, gives cancellation rights for distance and off-premises contracts, and treats unfair terms differently. Selling to the public needs a different document.
Two ways to charge, chosen at clause 5
Time and materials, or a fixed price. Keep the one you use and delete the other. The choice drives more than the invoice: on a fixed price the scope and the change control mechanism carry the commercial risk, while on time and materials the estimate, the rate card and the approval process do. Mixing the two wordings is the commonest drafting error in supplier terms.
The liability clause has a legal test to meet
Because these are standard terms, the exclusions and the cap at clause 10 have to be reasonable under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. A cap set at a figure the business could not survive paying is not more protective than a realistic one; it is likelier to be struck down, leaving the supplier with no cap at all. Set it against the fees under the contract and against what the insurer will actually cover, and keep the carve-outs the law requires for death, personal injury and fraud.
What else is in there
Ownership of intellectual property in the deliverables, confidentiality, data protection, suspension for non-payment, termination and the consequences of it, and the boilerplate that decides how notices are given and which law applies. Where the services involve processing personal data on the customer's behalf, Article 28 of the UK GDPR requires separate terms, which the data processing agreement provides, and where service levels are promised the service level agreement is designed to sit alongside these terms.
For a contract that is high value, that carries an indemnity, or that is being signed on the customer's paper rather than yours, our commercial contract solicitors review it on a fixed fee.
You may also find these useful
Talk to a solicitor about your situation
A template gets you started. When the facts are yours, one of our commercial solicitors will tailor it, or tell you plainly that you need something else. The first conversation is free.
Book a complimentary consultation
Willem van der Merwe
Co-Founder
Read profile
Willem van der Merwe
Co-Founder
Willem co-founded Lawyerly after twenty years of running and advising businesses, most of which were spent as a client of law firms rather than a member of one. He had seen how legal advice tends to arrive: late, priced by the hour, and detached from the commercial decision that prompted it. Lawyerly grew out of a conviction that it could be done differently.
He read law and marketing at university and later completed MIT Sloan's executive programme in artificial intelligence and business strategy. His career before Lawyerly took in two advertising agencies, which he led through the industry's move to digital, several years in digital publishing, and a period in international development, working on programmes across South East Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.
At Lawyerly he is responsible for growth and for the client experience, ensuring our clients receive the legal support they need.
Qualifications
BA Law; AI Business Strategy (MIT); Nomadic Marketing (UCT)